<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:ent="http://www.purl.org/NET/ENT/1.0/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
  <title>Eschatological Journeys</title>
  <link>http://alreadynotyet.blogware.com/blog</link>
  <description></description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:40:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
  <category domain="http://alreadynotyet.blogware.com/blog/OpenTheism">Open Theism</category>
  <generator>Blogware</generator>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
    <title>The Lord: A Divine Warrior</title>
    <link>http://alreadynotyet.blogware.com/blog/_archives/2005/10/4/1278933.html</link>
    <guid>http://alreadynotyet.blogware.com/blog/_archives/2005/10/4/1278933.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 07:36:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face=Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif&gt;Last week, in light of the biblical phrase &#39;The Lord of Host&#39; or the &#39;The Lord of War&#39;, I recommended to my &lt;EM&gt;Bethlehem Institute &lt;/EM&gt;students a book by Tremper Longman III entitled, &lt;EM&gt;God is a Warrior&lt;/EM&gt;.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src=&quot;tp://images.amazon.com/images/P/0310494613.01._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-dp-500-arrow,TopRight,45,-&quot;&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face=Arial&gt;Here is an article by Longman summerizing the argument of his book.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face=Arial&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.beginningwithmoses.org/articles/divinewarrior.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.beginningwithmoses.org/articles/divinewarrior.htm&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face=Arial&gt;This book is a good antidote to Greg Boyd&#39;s warfare theology.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://alreadynotyet.blogware.com/blog">Main Page</category>
    
    <category domain="http://alreadynotyet.blogware.com/blog/BiblicalTheology">Biblical Theology</category>
    
    <category domain="http://alreadynotyet.blogware.com/blog/OpenTheism">Open Theism</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
    <title>A Critique of Satan and the Problem of Evil by Gregory Boyd</title>
    <link>http://alreadynotyet.blogware.com/blog/_archives/2004/6/23/93345.html</link>
    <guid>http://alreadynotyet.blogware.com/blog/_archives/2004/6/23/93345.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:11:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You will find here a critique of Gregory Boyd&#39;s &lt;EM&gt;Satan and the Problem of Evil: Constructing a Trinitarian Warfare Theodicy&lt;/EM&gt;, which I co-authored with my good friend A. B. Caneday.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;One crucial element we discuss is that there is a great irony regarding Boyd&#39;s understanding of foreknowledge, especially in Romans 8.&amp;nbsp; The irony is that the open theist position is to many more &quot;relational&quot; than the reformed position, yet as it turns out the view which Boyd holds turns God&#39;s foreknowledge into that of the knowledge of an actuary.&amp;nbsp; That is, Boyd&#39;s view of God&#39;s foreknowledge is as remote and cold as one can get, for an actuary deals simplywith statics and probabilities.&amp;nbsp; This is very interesting especially since most if not all in the reformed camp take God&#39;s foreknowledge in Romans 8 to regard God&#39;s fore-love.&amp;nbsp; That is, God fore-knew/loved specific individuals.&amp;nbsp; When this is contrasted with what Boyd writes, the reformed position is much more relational, which the best reformed writers and theologians have always argued.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://alreadynotyet.blogware.com/Warfarecritique.pdf&quot;&gt;http://alreadynotyet.blogware.com/Warfarecritique.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    
    <category domain="http://alreadynotyet.blogware.com/blog/OpenTheism">Open Theism</category>
    
    
    
    
  </item>
  
</channel>
</rss>
