|
|
||||
|
This Month
Month Archive
Login
|
Thursday, February 23
by
Tim
on Thu 23 Feb 2006 03:43 PM CST
Mark Dever's sermons on the message of the New Testament have been collected into book form entitled Promises Kept. But you can hear the audio for this book at http://www.capitolhillbaptist.org/partner/Article_Display_Page/0,,PTID324006%7CCHID677216%7CCIID2058052,00.html.
One of my mentors from a distance Graeme Goldsworthy is very happy about this book and series. Monday, February 20
by
Tim
on Mon 20 Feb 2006 02:14 PM CST
Okay, so it has been too long since my last post. I hope to get back at this a bit more regularly. The primary reason for my lack of posting has been the death of my mother. Because of her death, I have had to give my attention to some other things. But, I am not getting caught up, and so I would begin to post again. For my first post back I will make it a safe one. Below you will find some links to audio files and articles regarding Genesis. I am especially happy to post the link to Gordon Hugenberger's audios for his class on Genesis. I am specifically interested to hear his treatment on Genesis 3 entitled, 'Clothed by the Lord'. I have heard much about Hugenberger's view, and I am almost salivating as I think about it. Enjoy!
Hugenberger: http://faculty.gordon.edu/hu/bi/Ted_Hildebrandt/OTeSources/01-Genesis/Audio/Hugenberger-Genesis/Hugenberger-GenSermons.htm Genesis in General http://www.salvationhistory.com/library/scripture/historical/oldtestament/genesis.cfm http://www.otgateway.com/genesis.htm http://faculty.gordon.edu/hu/bi/Ted_Hildebrandt/OTeSources/01-Genesis/Audio/AA_GenesisGordonAudioArticlesBib.htm Joseph Fitzmeyer on Melchizedek http://www.bsw.org/?l=71811&a=Ani01.html Thursday, October 20
by
Tim
on Thu 20 Oct 2005 05:57 AM PDT
I am currently listening N T Wright on Jesus:
Jesus and God Jesus and the Cross Jesus and the Kingdom Jesus and the World's True Light Listen and Enjoy! Tuesday, October 11
by
Tim
on Tue 11 Oct 2005 12:44 PM PDT
The Lord's Day Observance Society. Something here is not right. They write: The Divine Authority and perpetual Obligation of the Christian Sabbath or Lord's Day, and that in asserting the obligation of the Lord's Day, the gospel of the Grace of God through Christ Jesus should be proclaimed Hear is my take on it (Yes, I intended to write 'hear' not 'here'). Click the link and you will know why. Tuesday, October 4
by
Tim
on Tue 04 Oct 2005 05:36 AM PDT
Last week, in light of the biblical phrase 'The Lord of Host' or the 'The Lord of War', I recommended to my Bethlehem Institute students a book by Tremper Longman III entitled, God is a Warrior.
Here is an article by Longman summerizing the argument of his book. http://www.beginningwithmoses.org/articles/divinewarrior.htm This book is a good antidote to Greg Boyd's warfare theology. Thursday, September 15
by
Tim
on Thu 15 Sep 2005 11:24 AM PDT
David Peterson, a biblical theologian, who authored Possessed by God, which is a superb biblical theology of 'sanctification' also wrote, Engaging with God. This book is a biblical theology of worship. This book like 'Possessed' is a good book, and worthy of time and effort to understand it. I don't agree with every point, but it is still a great book. What is great is that The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary hosted David Peterson, and he gave four lectures on worship. You can download them for free here. Saturday, September 3
by
Tim
on Sat 03 Sep 2005 07:27 AM PDT
A bit
of time has passed since I posted on a biblical theological
theme. But I am excited about this post. Jim Hamilton over
at For His Renown
has written a great biblical theological piece arguing for a
typological understanding of Matthew's use of Isaiah 7:14. I have
seen the typological correspondence for some time, and it is good to
see that others see it as well. It is also good when they put it
on to paper. This is a good paper! You can read it here.
Friday, July 15
by
Tim
on Fri 15 Jul 2005 01:04 PM PDT
In an effort to
foster more talking about the sermons at Faith Community Church, where
I am one of the pastors, I have created a blog entitled Table
Talk. You can find it here,
and you can read about what I am trying to do. Right now it is a
temporary blog, an experiment to see if we get some good discussion
going on the four-week series I will preach beginning on July
23-24. Tell your friends and others you know at Faith Community.
by
Tim
on Fri 15 Jul 2005 12:37 PM PDT
One of the laments of preachers around Christmas time is that people should
not simply go through the formalism and the materialism of Christmas, but that
they should remember ‘the reason for the season’. What this presupposes, is that participation
in some elements of Christmas festivities does not mean full participation in
the worship of our redeeming God, who gave Jesus to die and live for the sake
of the elect. This same distinction is found in Isaiah 29.13 when the Lord says, “…[T]his
people draw near with their mouth and honor me with their lips, while their
hearts are far from me… (ESV). What we
find here is that simple participation in worship to YHWH is not true
worship. That is, one could go to the
temple, participate in the sacrifices, etc., and though there is participation,
true worship does not take place. In
other words participation in the elements of worship, without a heart devoted
to the Lord is not worship. What this means, it seems to me, is that we need to make this allowance
consistent in other areas of life. For
example, with Halloween, some argue that participation in the festivities of
this day means that one is participating in the whole of it. Thus, it is reasoned, if you go get free
candy from homes, then you are participating in some form of occultism. But as we see in Isaiah, and as we preach
against at Christmas, participation in some elements of a holiday or a service
does not entail full participation. This,
it seems to me, is what stands behind Paul’s discussion of food sacrificed to idols
(1 Cor 8-10). Also, this is what would
make the difference between Paul forbidding Christians to be circumcised in his
letter to the Galatians and Paul having Timothy circumcised for mission to the
Jews. What do you think? Is this
distinction justified? Are there areas
other than Halloween, where this distinction is true? Music?
Harry Potter? Movies? Alcohol?
Wednesday, June 29
by
Tim
on Wed 29 Jun 2005 05:49 AM PDT
Book reviews typically are not that funny, especially book reviews read at scholarly meetings. But much has been said of N.T. Wright's review of Crossian's book The Historical Jesus. In this review Wright uses Crossan's own method for reading the Gospels to show how flawed Crossan's method is. Those who originally heard this read at The Society of Biblical Literature Annual Meeting, say it was a hoot to hear. On special feature is that this essay was quickly written the night before it was spoken. Enjoy a little of the genius of Wright.
Monday, June 20
by
Tim
on Mon 20 Jun 2005 06:13 AM PDT
What is biblical theology? Is it simply theology that is faithful to the Bible? While biblical theology does aim at being faithful to the Bible, it is not simply this. Biblical theology is a discipline in the way that systematic theology and historical theology are disciplines. I would argue that biblical theology is the prince of the theological disciplines, but that it should not be seperated from the discipline of systematic and historical study. Goldsworthy has a nice article on this at 9marks. Thanks, JT for the article!
Friday, June 17
by
Tim
on Fri 17 Jun 2005 07:46 AM PDT
I
am still confused on how so many Western Evangelical Christians live
with so little a concern for the great return of the Lord Jesus.
This reality was a great motivator in the New Testament. The
irony is even more potent when one considers the popularity of the Left Behind Series. Here is an essay by Gareth Battan stating the same idea (HT: Bluefish).
Monday, June 13
by
Tim
on Mon 13 Jun 2005 08:59 PM PDT
Internetmonk writes,
I've been thinking about the subject of the Christian's assurance of
salvation. To put my cards on the table, I don't struggle with
assurance of salvation personally at all. I'm far more inclined toward
the "wider mercy"
view of God's love than I am toward any apprehensions about whether I
am among the elect. My struggles are over entirely different subjects: Does God exist? How can I face death without losing my sanity? Check in with me on those topics and I'll buy your joe. I'm interested because I spend a significant amount of time counseling students and adults on the subject of assurance. These are people who are unsure whether or not they are Christians at all. Some feel they never were, but most feel they've somehow started, and now failed, in their Christian faith. I rarely have anyone come to me doubting that God exists or questioning whether the Bible is true- both questions I would expect to hear frequently given the student population that I minister to at a boarding school. Instead of these fundamental questions, I continually have a conversation something like this: "I used to think I was a was Christian, but I don't think I am any more." "What has convinced you that you're not a Christian?" "I don't live like a Christian. I do a lot of things that I know Christians don't do. I rededicate my life to Christ all the time, but I just go right back to the same old things, and I don't see how a Christian would be so hypocritical. I'm lazy, and I really don't live the Christian life." See the remainder of the article here. He brings up a good point in this article, a point that is important for Christians to engage. The best book I know of for helping Christians think through issues of justification, sanctification, and assurance is The Race Set Before Us. ![]() This is a great book and is well worth the price. Sunday, May 29
by
Tim
on Sun 29 May 2005 08:03 AM PDT
My brief review of Goldsworthy's book Preaching the Whole Bible as Christian Scripture is published at the Edgren Fellowship website. Read it here.
![]()
by
Tim
on Sun 29 May 2005 07:42 AM PDT
In light of my
recent post on James 2:14-26, I have begun to work on some theses
regarding faith/deed/justification. There is a danger, I suppose,
in posting these theses prior to working all of them out, but I will
begin with this list of five, and then when I add to them, I will
up-date the list. If you have any suggestions along the way are
appreciated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday, May 23
by
Tim
on Mon 23 May 2005 01:33 PM PDT
Carson gave three lectures on this topic. They are good. Wednesday, May 18
by
Tim
on Wed 18 May 2005 07:23 AM PDT
I am greatly indebted to Goldsworthy’s books (The Goldsworthy Trilogy, According to Plan, and Preaching the Whole Bible as Christian Scripture). Goldsworthy has helped me a great deal in understanding the structure of revelation and seeing the big picture of the Bible as God’s story climaxing in Jesus the King. Because of this, I think Goldsworthy is a must read for all Christian preachers, and I recommend him to all Christians. With this said, I still think that Goldsworthy can be improved (as we all can), and I think one area regards God ruling his creation by the means of Man, male and female. I may have missed something in Goldsworthy’s work, but I don’t think that he gives rightful place to God ruling his creation through a) God’s People b) In God’s Place c) Under God’s Rule (The Goldsworthy Trilogy, 54). Now, while this is helpful I do not think it is dare I say biblical enough. Why? Because of the role of Man as the image of God. In Genesis 1:26-28 it is written, 26 Then God said, "Let us make man as our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground." 27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. 28 God blessed them and said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground" (Personal Translation). What we have here is that because Man, male and female, is made to be the image of God after the likeness of God; he is to rule over the creation which God had made. In other words, God is ruling his creation through the kingship of a) God ruling b) In God’s place c) By his people With these elements in place, I think there is a more biblically defined view of the …the “coming” of the Thursday, April 21
by
Tim
on Thu 21 Apr 2005 11:56 AM PDT
Here is an online presentation of 'kingdom of God' as a 'tract' for evangelism. This is good!
http://www.sok.org.uk/
by
Tim
on Thu 21 Apr 2005 11:48 AM PDT
Okay, I know some might think that this is a lame post, since it deals
with a previous post, but I am going to do it anyway. Well, I
haven't posted in sometime, I've been gone, etc. So I want to
re-recommend Carson's talks on Suffering to be found here:
http://www.denverseminary.edu/worship/media.php These two lectures are great! I highly recommend them! I just listened on my iPod, while I was driving. These lectures are very helpful for giving big structures for understanding the 'problem of evil'. Again, listen to these! Monday, March 21
by
Tim
on Mon 21 Mar 2005 06:21 AM PST
Here is a little essay I worked up to express what I am seeing Paul to say in Ephesians 5:18. Enjoy! Friday, February 25
by
Tim
on Thu 24 Feb 2005 10:02 PM PST
There is a new blog starting, which looks like it may be pretty
good. It is by two biblical theologians seeking to work their way
through Romans and then Galatians. Definately bookmark it and
check it often. I know I will!
http://crosstalking.blogspot.com/ Friday, January 28
by
Tim
on Fri 28 Jan 2005 09:02 PM PST
Ed Clowney wrote an article on prayer some time ago entitled A Biblical Theology of Prayer. This is a great article. You can read the pdf. from www.beginningwithmoses.org.
Here is a great quote from the article: We dare not address the Father without awareness of the Son. To do so would be to fail to pray in the name of Jesus. Nor should we pray without recognising that the Lord is present to help us, present in the abiding reality of the Holy Spirit. To be sure, in our weakness and finitude, we may think now of the Father, now of the Son, now of the Spirit. Yet we do sense that our prayer is to the Trinity. The Spirit who makes intercession for us guides our praying, for he witnesses to the Father and to the Son. Here, too, the Scripture gives sure guidance. Clearly prayer in the New Testament is addressed to the Father. In the teaching of Jesus, in the record of Acts, in the Epistles, Christian believers bow to the Father from whom the whole family in heaven and on earth is named (Eph. 3:14). Does this uniform practice ignore or replace prayer to the Trinity? Not at all; rather, it is in addressing the Father that we can best respond to the full revelation of the Trinity. It would be foolish (indeed, blasphemous) to imagine a kind of jealousy within the Trinity, as though the Son would feel slighted by our appeal to the Father. Indeed, such a travesty is in no way possible. We cannot turn our backs to the Son in order to address the Father. The Father will not hear such prayer. Only as we come in the name of the Son can we pray to the Father. Prayer to the Father is not a limitation of our prayer. It does not exclude Christ, but confesses the purpose for which he gave his life. He came, not only to claim those that the Father had given him, but to bring them to the Father, losing none of them (John 17:12). The triumph of the work of the Son is to make us acceptable to the Father through him (John 16:27). Prayer to the Father exhibits the consciousness of sonship that crowns prayer in Christ. The total submission of prayer, its utter trust, looks to Jesus Christ. He is Lord; we come to him with our burden of sin and receive forgiveness and life. Yet when Jesus receives us to himself and unites us to himself we are more than delivered from sin, more than made heirs of eternal life: we are brought into a relation with God the Father that can exist only because Jesus is the divine Son. We are made sons of God. Yes, children by the new birth, but, in a sense, more than children. In Christ there is no longer male and female: we are sons in the Son. The lessons of prayer all hinge on this incredible reality; we bring to the Father the dedication of our new obedience (Rom. 12:1, 2); we recognise his discipline (Heb. 12:5-7); we seek his will, his plan, his kingdom. In the urgency of our helpless need, we come to him with importunity, knowing that our Father will not give us a stone for bread (Luke 11:11-13). The prayer of sonship to the Father breathes assurance as well as dependence. We realise that the love of the heavenly Father is all our hope. Surprisingly, Paul writes, 'But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us' (Rom. 5:8). Since Paul was speaking of the willingness of a man to give his life for a friend, we should have expected him to write, 'But Christ demonstrates his own love . . .' Calvary displays not only the love of the Son who gave himself for us, it demonstrates the love of the Father, who gave his only Son. All the delight of heaven itself begins in prayer as the Spirit of the Father and of the Son draws us into communion with the triune God. We pray, 'Abba, Father!' and our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son, Jesus Christ (1 John 1:3). Thursday, January 27
by
Tim
on Thu 27 Jan 2005 11:06 AM PST
Tuesday, August 31
by
Tim
on Tue 31 Aug 2004 09:45 AM PDT
I am attaching a paper that I read at the Midwest Meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society in 2003. I wrote it because I see many worship songs which romanticize the relationship between Jesus and the individual. This trend scares me. So I wanted to think it through biblically. This is my attempt. Hope it is helpful!
Any comments would be appreciated! Monday, July 19
by
Tim
on Mon 19 Jul 2004 06:24 AM PDT
I am in the process of reading a good article on the Mosaic Law. A few points that I like so far are: 1. The author sees the references to Law in the New Testament as references to the Mosaic Law, and not to legalism. 2. He sees the crucial passage in Matthew regarding not abolishing and fulfilling in an helpful way, that is Jesus does not destroy the Mosaic Law, but in fulfilling it he is bringing it to completion. This is so crucial!
I will write a bit more, once I finish the essay and have a chance to reflect on it. But until then you can download the pdf. version of the essay from http://www.beginningwithmoses.org/ The essay is entitled, The Curse of Law, by Pete Sanlon. Wednesday, June 30
by
Tim
on Wed 30 Jun 2004 02:04 PM PDT
I just read an article in the latest Journal of the Evangelical Society regarding 1 Corinthians 15:56. There has been a great deal of ink spilled over this verse, primarily because it does not seem to fit the context. Why does Paul move conceptually from death to sin to law? Well, I think Vlachos, is on the right track, for he argues that the movement from death to sin to law is Paul's reflection on Genesis 2 and 3. This works in the context because Paul has already made first Adam/second Adam categories earlier in chapter 15. I found the article very helpful for putting the verse in context, and especially for keeping the verse within the creation/new creation theme Paul is working in chapter 15. As I reflect on the implications of this, I will post them. There is one implication that I am specifically seeing and that is the movement from verse 56 through verse 57 to verse 58 as all new creation, and that because of the new creation in Christ, not only is death and sin defeated, but also the curse upon work is reversed, so that Paul can say, "Your labor in the Lord is not in vain" (v. 58).
|
Recent Articles
My Favorite Web Logs
Search
|
||


