This Month
February 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28
Year Archive
Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
View Article  Mark Dever Audio
Mark Dever's sermons on the message of the New Testament have been collected into book form entitled Promises Kept.  But you can hear the audio for this book at http://www.capitolhillbaptist.org/partner/Article_Display_Page/0,,PTID324006%7CCHID677216%7CCIID2058052,00.html.

One of my mentors from a distance Graeme Goldsworthy is very happy about this book and series.
View Article  Genesis Links
Okay, so it has been too long since my last post.  I hope to get back at this a bit more regularly.  The primary reason for my lack of posting has been the death of my mother.  Because of her death, I have had to give my attention to some other things.  But, I am not getting caught up, and so I would begin to post again.  For my first post back I will make it a safe one.  Below you will find some links to audio files and articles regarding Genesis.  I am especially happy to post the link to Gordon Hugenberger's audios for his class on Genesis.  I am specifically interested to hear his treatment on Genesis 3 entitled, 'Clothed by the Lord'.  I have heard much about Hugenberger's view, and I am almost salivating as I think about it.  Enjoy!

Hugenberger:
http://faculty.gordon.edu/hu/bi/Ted_Hildebrandt/OTeSources/01-Genesis/Audio/Hugenberger-Genesis/Hugenberger-GenSermons.htm

Genesis in General
http://www.salvationhistory.com/library/scripture/historical/oldtestament/genesis.cfm

http://www.otgateway.com/genesis.htm

http://faculty.gordon.edu/hu/bi/Ted_Hildebrandt/OTeSources/01-Genesis/Audio/AA_GenesisGordonAudioArticlesBib.htm

Joseph Fitzmeyer on Melchizedek
http://www.bsw.org/?l=71811&a=Ani01.html


View Article  What I Am Hearing Lately
I am currently listening N T Wright on Jesus:
Jesus and God
Jesus and the Cross
Jesus and the Kingdom
Jesus and the World's True Light

Listen and Enjoy!
View Article  Filed under 'Not How I See It'

The Lord's Day Observance Society.  Something here is not right.  They write:

The Divine Authority and perpetual Obligation of the Christian Sabbath or Lord's Day, and that in asserting the obligation of the Lord's Day, the gospel of the Grace of God through Christ Jesus should be proclaimed 

Hear is my take on it (Yes, I intended to write 'hear' not 'here').  Click the link and you will know why.

View Article  The Lord: A Divine Warrior

Last week, in light of the biblical phrase 'The Lord of Host' or the 'The Lord of War', I recommended to my Bethlehem Institute students a book by Tremper Longman III entitled, God is a Warrior.

 

Here is an article by Longman summerizing the argument of his book.

http://www.beginningwithmoses.org/articles/divinewarrior.htm 

This book is a good antidote to Greg Boyd's warfare theology.

View Article  Engaging God

David Peterson, a biblical theologian, who authored Possessed by God, which is a superb biblical theology of 'sanctification' also wrote, Engaging with God.  This book is a biblical theology of worship.  This book like 'Possessed' is a good book, and worthy of time and effort to understand it.  I don't agree with every point, but it is still a great book.  What is great is that The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary hosted David Peterson, and he gave four lectures on worship.  You can download them for free here.

View Article  A Virgin Will Conceive
A bit of time has passed since I posted on a biblical theological theme.  But I am excited about this post.  Jim Hamilton over at For His Renown has written a great biblical theological piece arguing for a typological understanding of Matthew's use of Isaiah 7:14.  I have seen the typological correspondence for some time, and it is good to see that others see it as well.  It is also good when they put it on to paper.  This is a good paper!  You can read it here.
View Article  I have started another blog
In an effort to foster more talking about the sermons at Faith Community Church, where I am one of the pastors, I have created a blog entitled Table Talk.  You can find it here, and you can read about what I am trying to do.  Right now it is a temporary blog, an experiment to see if we get some good discussion going on the four-week series I will preach beginning on July 23-24.  Tell your friends and others you know at Faith Community.
View Article  Your Hearts are Far From Me

One of the laments of preachers around Christmas time is that people should not simply go through the formalism and the materialism of Christmas, but that they should remember ‘the reason for the season’.  What this presupposes, is that participation in some elements of Christmas festivities does not mean full participation in the worship of our redeeming God, who gave Jesus to die and live for the sake of the elect.

 

This same distinction is found in Isaiah 29.13 when the Lord says, “…[T]his people draw near with their mouth and honor me with their lips, while their hearts are far from me… (ESV).  What we find here is that simple participation in worship to YHWH is not true worship.  That is, one could go to the temple, participate in the sacrifices, etc., and though there is participation, true worship does not take place.  In other words participation in the elements of worship, without a heart devoted to the Lord is not worship.

 

What this means, it seems to me, is that we need to make this allowance consistent in other areas of life.  For example, with Halloween, some argue that participation in the festivities of this day means that one is participating in the whole of it.  Thus, it is reasoned, if you go get free candy from homes, then you are participating in some form of occultism.  But as we see in Isaiah, and as we preach against at Christmas, participation in some elements of a holiday or a service does not entail full participation.  This, it seems to me, is what stands behind Paul’s discussion of food sacrificed to idols (1 Cor 8-10).  Also, this is what would make the difference between Paul forbidding Christians to be circumcised in his letter to the Galatians and Paul having Timothy circumcised for mission to the Jews.

 

What do you think?  Is this distinction justified?  Are there areas other than Halloween, where this distinction is true?  Music?  Harry Potter?  Movies?  Alcohol? 

View Article  Taking the Text with Her Pleasure
Book reviews typically are not that funny, especially book reviews read at scholarly meetings.  But much has been said of N.T. Wright's review of Crossian's book The Historical Jesus.  In this review Wright uses Crossan's own method for reading the Gospels to show how flawed Crossan's method is.  Those who originally heard this read at The Society of Biblical Literature Annual Meeting, say it was a hoot to hear.  On special feature is that this essay was quickly written the night before it was spoken.  Enjoy a little of the genius of Wright.
View Article  What is Biblical Theology?
What is biblical theology?  Is it simply theology that is faithful to the Bible?  While biblical theology does aim at being faithful to the Bible, it is not simply this.  Biblical theology is a discipline in the way that systematic theology and historical theology are disciplines.  I would argue that biblical theology is the prince of the theological disciplines, but that it should not be seperated from the discipline of systematic and historical study.  Goldsworthy has a nice article on this at 9marks.  Thanks, JT for the article!
View Article  Neglect of the Return of Jesus
I am still confused on how so many Western Evangelical Christians live with so little a concern for the great return of the Lord Jesus.  This reality was a great motivator in the New Testament.  The irony is even more potent when one considers the popularity of the Left Behind Series.  Here is an essay by Gareth Battan stating the same idea (HT: Bluefish).
View Article  Reformed Theology and Christian Assurance
Internetmonk writes,

I've been thinking about the subject of the Christian's assurance of salvation. To put my cards on the table, I don't struggle with assurance of salvation personally at all. I'm far more inclined toward the "wider mercy" view of God's love than I am toward any apprehensions about whether I am among the elect. My struggles are over entirely different subjects: Does God exist? How can I face death without losing my sanity? Check in with me on those topics and I'll buy your joe.

I'm interested because I spend a significant amount of time counseling students and adults on the subject of assurance. These are people who are unsure whether or not they are Christians at all. Some feel they never were, but most feel they've somehow started, and now failed, in their Christian faith. I rarely have anyone come to me doubting that God exists or questioning whether the Bible is true- both questions I would expect to hear frequently given the student population that I minister to at a boarding school. Instead of these fundamental questions, I continually have a conversation something like this:

"I used to think I was a was Christian, but I don't think I am any more."

"What has convinced you that you're not a Christian?"

"I don't live like a Christian. I do a lot of things that I know Christians don't do. I rededicate my life to Christ all the time, but I just go right back to the same old things, and I don't see how a Christian would be so hypocritical. I'm lazy, and I really don't live the Christian life."


See the remainder of the article here.  He brings up a good point in this article, a point that is important for Christians to engage.  The best book I know of for helping Christians think through issues of justification, sanctification, and assurance is The Race Set Before Us.

This is a great book and is well worth the price.

View Article  Review of Graeme Goldsworthy's 'Preaching the Whole Bible as Christian Scripture'
My brief review of Goldsworthy's book Preaching the Whole Bible as Christian Scripture is published at the Edgren Fellowship website.  Read it here.


View Article  Theses Regarding Faith, Deeds, and Justification
In light of my recent post on James 2:14-26, I have begun to work on some theses regarding faith/deed/justification.  There is a danger, I suppose, in posting these theses prior to working all of them out, but I will begin with this list of five, and then when I add to them, I will up-date the list.  If you have any suggestions along the way are appreciated.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  1. Faith and works are organically related, and thus they should not be separated.  They are as organic as life and breath.
  2. Though faith and works should not be separated, they are distinguishable.  This is shown in that faith precedes works.  Paul writes in Romans 1:5 regarding an obedience which comes from faith.  Works do not produce faith, but faith produces works. 
  3. Where there is faith there will also be works (Romans 1:5).  If there are no works, then there is no faith.  James writes, “As the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without deeds is dead” (James 1:26, NIV).
  4. Works are not the basis of our justification, nor is faith the basis of our justification, on the basis of the grace of God were are declared righteous.  Paul writes, “being freely declared righteous by his grace through the redemption which is in Messiah Jesus” (Romans 3:24).  He also writes in Ephesians 2:8-9, “8 For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—9 not by works, so that no one can boast” (NIV).
  5. The basis of our justification is God’s grace and it will be in keeping with our deeds.  Paul writes, [God] will render to everyone in keeping with his deeds (Romans 2:6).  James writes, “You see that a person is justified by what he does and not by faith alone” (James 2:24, NIV).  Jesus states, “For by your words you will be acquitted, and by your words you will be condemned” (Matthew 12:37, NIV).

View Article  Carson on the so-called New Perspective on Paul

Carson gave three lectures on this topic.  They are good.

http://fieryones.com/lectures/

View Article  An Improvement on Goldsworthy?

I am greatly indebted to Goldsworthy’s books (The Goldsworthy Trilogy, According to Plan, and Preaching the Whole Bible as Christian Scripture).  Goldsworthy has helped me a great deal in understanding the structure of revelation and seeing the big picture of the Bible as God’s story climaxing in Jesus the King.  Because of this, I think Goldsworthy is a must read for all Christian preachers, and I recommend him to all Christians.

          With this said, I still think that Goldsworthy can be improved (as we all can), and I think one area regards God ruling his creation by the means of Man, male and female.  I may have missed something in Goldsworthy’s work, but I don’t think that he gives rightful place to God ruling his creation through Man.  Goldsworthy’s typical pattern for the Kingdom is

a)    God’s People

b)    In God’s Place

c)     Under God’s Rule (The Goldsworthy Trilogy, 54).

Now, while this is helpful I do not think it is dare I say biblical enough.  Why?  Because of the role of Man as the image of God.  In Genesis 1:26-28 it is written,

          26 Then God said, "Let us make man as our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground."  27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.    28 God blessed them and said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground" (Personal Translation).

 

What we have here is that because Man, male and female, is made to be the image of God after the likeness of God; he is to rule over the creation which God had made.  In other words, God is ruling his creation through the kingship of Man.  Some have called this the vicegerency of Man (See especially Dan McCartney’s Ecce Homo: The Coming of the Kingdom as the Restoration of Human Vicegerency, WTJ 56:1 [Spring 1994], 1-24).  Because of the vicegerency of Man I think we need to tweak Goldsworthy’s kingdom of God pattern to something like the following:

a)    God ruling

b)    In God’s place

c)     By his people

With these elements in place, I think there is a more biblically defined view of the kingdom of God.  McCartney summarizes this emphasis on vicegerency thusly,

…the “coming” of the kingdom of God that is expected in the OT involves a reinstatement of humanity to the proper position of vicegerent, exercising the reign of God on earth. This vicegerent reign is imminent, indeed is already here, in the preaching and actions of Jesus and the testimony of the Evangelists. It is already here, in even greater measure though not yet in its fullness, in the preaching of Paul and the other apostles, as they proclaim Christ’s exaltation and his receiving of dominion as the anointed king, God’s Son. It is also growing as the vicegerency of The Man is given to Christ’s elect ones, the saints of the Most High ( Dan 7:18 , 27 ), who are also anointed by the Holy One (1 John 2:20) who thus already reign with Christ in heavenly places (Eph 2:6 ). Finally, at “that day” the vicegerency of all who are in Christ will be fully realized, and the reign of God will be all in all (McCartney, Ecce, 24).

View Article  The Story of a Kingdom
Here is an online presentation of 'kingdom of God' as a 'tract' for evangelism.  This is good!

http://www.sok.org.uk/
View Article  Again on Carson
Okay, I know some might think that this is a lame post, since it deals with a previous post, but I am going to do it anyway.  Well, I haven't posted in sometime, I've been gone, etc.  So I want to re-recommend Carson's talks on Suffering to be found here:
http://www.denverseminary.edu/worship/media.php

These two lectures are great!  I highly recommend them!  I just listened on my iPod, while I was driving.  These lectures are very helpful for giving big structures for understanding the 'problem of evil'.

Again, listen to these!
View Article  Interpreting Ephesians 5:18

Here is a little essay I worked up to express what I am seeing Paul to say in Ephesians 5:18.

Enjoy!

1 Attachments
View Article  A New Blog Starting
There is a new blog starting, which looks like it may be pretty good.  It is by two biblical theologians seeking to work their way through Romans and then Galatians.  Definately bookmark it and check it often.  I know I will!

http://crosstalking.blogspot.com/
View Article  A Great Article on Prayer
Ed Clowney wrote an article on prayer some time ago entitled A Biblical Theology of Prayer.  This is a great article.  You can read the pdf. from www.beginningwithmoses.org.

Here is a great quote from the article:
We dare not address the Father without awareness of the Son. To do so would be to fail to pray in the name of Jesus. Nor should we pray without recognising that the Lord is present to help us, present in the abiding reality of the Holy Spirit. To be sure, in our weakness and finitude, we may think now of the Father, now of the Son, now of the Spirit. Yet we do sense that our prayer is to the Trinity. The Spirit who makes intercession for us guides our praying, for he witnesses to the Father and to the Son.

Here, too, the Scripture gives sure guidance. Clearly prayer in the New Testament is addressed to the Father. In the teaching of Jesus, in the record of Acts, in the Epistles, Christian believers bow to the Father from whom the whole family in heaven and on earth is named (Eph. 3:14). Does this uniform practice ignore or replace prayer to the Trinity? Not at all; rather, it is in addressing the Father that we can best respond to the full revelation of the Trinity. It would be foolish (indeed, blasphemous) to imagine a kind of jealousy within the Trinity, as though the Son would feel slighted by our appeal to the Father. Indeed, such a travesty is in no way possible. We cannot turn our backs to the Son in order to address the Father. The Father will not hear such prayer. Only as we come in the name of the Son can we pray to the Father.

Prayer to the Father is not a limitation of our prayer. It does not exclude Christ, but confesses the purpose for which he gave his life. He came, not only to claim those that the Father had given him, but to bring them to the Father, losing none of them (John 17:12). The triumph of the work of the Son is to make us acceptable to the Father through him (John 16:27).

Prayer to the Father exhibits the consciousness of sonship that crowns prayer in Christ. The total submission of prayer, its utter trust, looks to Jesus Christ. He is Lord; we come to him with our burden of sin and receive forgiveness and life. Yet when Jesus receives us to himself and unites us to himself we are more than delivered from sin, more than made heirs of eternal life: we are brought into a relation with God the Father that can exist only because Jesus is the divine Son. We are made sons of God. Yes, children by the new birth, but, in a sense, more than children. In Christ there is no longer male and female: we are sons in the Son.

The lessons of prayer all hinge on this incredible reality; we bring to the Father the dedication of our new obedience (Rom. 12:1, 2); we recognise his discipline (Heb. 12:5-7); we seek his will, his plan, his kingdom. In the urgency of our helpless need, we come to him with importunity, knowing that our Father will not give us a stone for bread (Luke 11:11-13).

The prayer of sonship to the Father breathes assurance as well as dependence. We realise that the love of the heavenly Father is all our hope. Surprisingly, Paul writes, 'But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us' (Rom. 5:8). Since Paul was speaking of the willingness of a man to give his life for a friend, we should have expected him to write, 'But Christ demonstrates his own love . . .' Calvary displays not only the love of the Son who gave himself for us, it demonstrates the love of the Father, who gave his only Son.

All the delight of heaven itself begins in prayer as the Spirit of the Father and of the Son draws us into communion with the triune God. We pray, 'Abba, Father!' and our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son, Jesus Christ (1 John 1:3).


View Article  Biblical Theology is Story Theology
http://www.hornes.org/theologia/content/rich_lusk/what_is_biblical_theology.htm
View Article  Sexual Imagery in Worship

I am attaching a paper that I read at the Midwest Meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society in 2003.  I wrote it because I see many worship songs which romanticize the relationship between Jesus and the individual.  This trend scares me.  So I wanted to think it through biblically.  This is my attempt.  Hope it is helpful!

 

Any comments would be appreciated!

1 Attachments
View Article  The New Testament and the Law

I am in the process of reading a good article on the Mosaic Law.  A few points that I like so far are:

1.  The author sees the references to Law in the New Testament as references to the Mosaic Law, and not to legalism.

2.  He sees the crucial passage in Matthew regarding not abolishing and fulfilling in an helpful way, that is Jesus does not destroy the Mosaic Law, but in fulfilling it he is bringing it to completion.  This is so crucial! 

 

I will write a bit more, once I finish the essay and have a chance to reflect on it.  But until then you can download the pdf. version of the essay from http://www.beginningwithmoses.org/

The essay is entitled, The Curse of Law, by Pete Sanlon.

View Article  Law, sin, and death

I just read an article in the latest Journal of the Evangelical Society regarding 1 Corinthians 15:56.  There has been a great deal of ink spilled over this verse, primarily because it does not seem to fit the context.  Why does Paul move conceptually from death to sin to law?  Well, I think Vlachos, is on the right track, for he argues that the movement from death to sin to law is Paul's reflection on Genesis 2 and 3.  This works in the context because Paul has already made first Adam/second Adam categories earlier in chapter 15.  I found the article very helpful for putting the verse in context, and especially for keeping the verse within the creation/new creation theme Paul is working in chapter 15.  As I reflect on the implications of this, I will post them.  There is one implication that I am specifically seeing and that is the movement from verse 56 through verse 57 to verse 58 as all new creation, and that because of the new creation in Christ, not only is death and sin defeated, but also the curse upon work is reversed, so that Paul can say, "Your labor in the Lord is not in vain" (v. 58).